ArmitronSport Retro Digital Chronograph Bracelet Watch, 40/8474

Wow the quality of this watch for the price crazy. Pictures do not do this watch justice. Beautiful watch, easy to operate, nice wieght and size. No complaints what so ever.

Excellent watch for its price! Glass is mineral, case is steel. Screen readability is not as good as Casio, but also at a fairly good level. Backlight is not bad, but the button is not always responsive and because of this sometimes flickering occurs and you need to press it again several times. Perhaps over time the button will become softer and the defect will be eliminated. I can recommend the watch for purchase.

I've liked the look of Casio's low-end watches for a long time, but always found them to be just too plasticy. It feels like a toy. But they never make a metal version, or when they do the price jumps from $15 to $100.So I am so glad I found this. It has the classic look but feels substantial and durable. The pushers are pleasant to use, the chime is surprisingly loud for such a small watch, and the functions it has are easy to use. I do wish it had a timer as well as an alarm, but for the price it's not unreasonable.Like all these cheap digital watches, I find the metal band it came on totally useless, but it looks great on any 18mm strap, which I have a bunch of. I'm currently using a silicon OD green strap, but it looks good and wears well on NATO straps as well.My only major complaint is the backlight, which is indeed terrible. Though... The numerals are quite legible, even in low light, and the light is just barely bright enough to make it readable in total darkness. For me it works most of the time. And most other cheap digital watches also have terrible backlights. I wish every watch could have Timex Indiglo, but alas.Still, this is currently straight to the top of my favorite digital watches. I can't imagine it being unseated by anything that isn't substantially more expensive.

The Armitron Sport Retro Digital Chronograph hits all the right notes. Stainless steel case and bracelet, just what I’ve been wishing Casio would do at this price. It’s got everything—two world times, so you can keep track of your local time and another time zone. The hourly chime and stopwatch are solid features, and the LED backlight is a nice touch for low-light moments. Plus, the beeps and alarms are loud and punchy, thanks to the steel resonance. The 80’s retro feel and hefty build just take it to the next level!

I was delighted after unboxing and wearing the Armitron Rubik. Typically, at this price point, you're looking at a plastic or resin case with a flimsy strap. However, this watch feels much more premium compared to a similar-priced Casio. The case is made entirely of stainless steel, and the bracelet is impressively good. The finishing is quite decent, with consistent brushing on both the case and bracelet. Fortunately, the watch is not prone to scratches or fingerprints. In terms of functionality, it includes an alarm, stopwatch, and a second time zone. You can also set it to chime every hour, which I find quite handy. The display is clear and easy to read. My only gripe is the backlight, which is practically useless, as many reviewers have noted. However, this isn't a deal breaker for me. I would rate this watch 4.5 stars (rounded up to 5).

Pro: all stainless steel, not silver painted plastic, which gives a sense of quality. Neat retro vibe.Cons: far too small at least for me. Looks like a child’s or women’s watch. Perhaps that’s true to the original 80s design but not for me. Also, the backlight is useless.

The box was ripped open, but was in the plastic bag fully sealed.Although the light it has isn’t good, it’s like the Casio F91. But it’s $30 to the Casio A168WG(G)’s $65-70.In the photos I’m comparing it to my Casio A700, it weighs 1/4 of a pounds more and the case is 2.5mm thicker. The A700 is 0.11 pounds, 6mm thick, costs $35 and the case is made of resin.If I want a Casio with durability I’ll go with the armitron. If I want a Casio that feels like I’m wearing nothing on my wrist I’ll go with the A700.

For $27 or so, how can you go wrong? It’s a fun, digital throwback.It’s easy to use, it’s stainless steel, keeps good time and makes me want to watch Back to the Future.Only negative: the light is poor. Almost unusable. But that’s ok.Fun addition to a collection.